OWASP Top 10 API Security: Broken Authentication

In today’s digital landscape, APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) play a crucial role in enabling communication and interaction between various software systems. However, APIs can also become a target for attackers if proper security measures are not implemented. One common vulnerability that exposes APIs to risks is broken authentication. In this technical article, we will explore the threat agents, attack vectors, security weaknesses, and impacts associated with API2:2023 broken authentication. We will also discuss examples of attack scenarios and provide preventive measures to mitigate this vulnerability.

Threat Agents/Attack Vectors

Threat agents targeting broken authentication can range from opportunistic attackers to sophisticated hackers. The attack vectors associated with broken authentication can be categorized as follows:

1. Exploitability Easy: The authentication mechanism is often an easy target for attackers as it is exposed to everyone. Although some authentication issues may require advanced technical skills for exploitation, readily available exploitation tools make it accessible to a wider range of attackers.
2. Security Weakness: The prevalence of broken authentication is primarily attributed to misconceptions and implementation complexities surrounding authentication boundaries. Software and security engineers may have incorrect assumptions or lack a comprehensive understanding of how to implement secure authentication mechanisms. This leads to the following security weakness:
3. Misconceptions and Implementation Complexity: Software and security engineers’ misconceptions regarding authentication boundaries and inherent implementation complexity make authentication issues prevalent. These misconceptions can result in vulnerable authentication mechanisms, leaving APIs exposed to attacks.

Impacts: The impacts of broken authentication can have severe technical and business-specific consequences. When authentication mechanisms are compromised, attackers gain unauthorized access to user accounts, leading to the following impacts:

1. Complete Account Takeover: Attackers can gain complete control of other users’ accounts in the system, allowing them to read personal data and perform sensitive actions on their behalf. This compromise can lead to privacy breaches, financial loss, reputational damage, and legal consequences.
2. Difficulty in Detection: Broken authentication attacks can be challenging to detect since the actions of attackers often mimic legitimate user behavior. Systems struggle to distinguish between the actions of attackers and genuine users, making it difficult to identify and respond to such attacks promptly.

Is the API Vulnerable?

To determine if an API is vulnerable to broken authentication, it is essential to assess several factors. An API can be considered vulnerable if it exhibits any of the following characteristics:

1. Credential Stuffing: The API permits credential stuffing attacks, where attackers use brute force techniques with a list of valid usernames and passwords to gain unauthorized access.
2. Brute Force Attacks: The API allows attackers to perform brute force attacks on the same user account without implementing mechanisms such as CAPTCHA or account lockout, which would prevent multiple failed login attempts.
3. Weak Passwords: The API permits the use of weak passwords, which are easily guessable or susceptible to dictionary attacks.
4. Insecure Transmission: The API sends sensitive authentication details, such as authentication tokens and passwords, in the URL. This practice exposes sensitive information to potential interception or unauthorized access.
5. Lack of Confirmation for Sensitive Operations: The API allows users to perform sensitive operations, such as changing email addresses or passwords, without requiring password confirmation. This makes it easier for attackers to take control of user accounts.
6. Lack of Token Authenticity Validation: The API does not validate the authenticity of tokens, making it susceptible to token tampering or injection attacks.
7. Use of Weak or Unsigned JWT Tokens: The API accepts unsigned or weakly signed JWT (JSON Web Token) tokens, which can be exploited by attackers to gain unauthorized access.
8. Lack of JWT Expiration Validation: The API does not validate the expiration date of JWT tokens, allowing expired tokens to be accepted and used for authentication.
9. Insecure Password Storage: The API stores passwords in plain text, non-encrypted, or weakly hashed formats, making them vulnerable to unauthorized access.
10. Weak Encryption Keys: The API uses weak encryption keys, which can be exploited by attackers to decrypt sensitive information.

In addition to these vulnerabilities specific to APIs, microservices can have their own set of vulnerabilities related to broken authentication. A microservice is considered vulnerable if:

1. Lack of Authentication: Other microservices can access it without requiring proper authentication, leading to unauthorized access.
2. Weak or Predictable Tokens: The microservice relies on weak or predictable tokens for authentication, making it easier for attackers to impersonate legitimate users.

Example Attack Scenarios: To better understand the implications of broken authentication, let’s examine two attack scenarios commonly associated with this vulnerability.

Broken Authentication Examples

Scenario #1

Brute Forcing User Accounts In this scenario, the API’s authentication mechanism allows clients to log in by sending a GraphQL request with user credentials. Attackers leverage GraphQL query batching to bypass rate limiting and speed up brute force attacks. By sending multiple login requests with different passwords, attackers attempt to find valid credentials and gain unauthorized access to user accounts.

Scenario #2

Account Takeover via Email Update In this scenario, the API allows users to update their email addresses without requiring confirmation of their current password. Attackers who manage to steal the authentication token can update the victim’s email address. Subsequently, they initiate a password reset workflow, taking advantage of the compromised account and effectively gaining full control.

How to Prevent Broken Authentication

Preventing broken authentication requires a proactive approach to implement secure authentication mechanisms. Consider the following preventive measures:

1. Understand Authentication Flows: Ensure that all possible authentication flows, such as mobile, web, and deep links, are thoroughly understood and protected. Collaborate with engineers to identify any missed flows and potential vulnerabilities.
2. Know Authentication Mechanisms: Gain a comprehensive understanding of the authentication mechanisms used in your system. It is essential to distinguish between authentication and authorization, and to avoid reinventing the wheel by leveraging industry standards and best practices.
3. Use Established Standards: Implement authentication, token generation, and password storage using established standards rather than reinventing these components. Standards such as OAuth and secure password hashing algorithms can significantly enhance security.
4. Treat Recovery/Forgot Password Endpoints Securely: Treat recovery or forgot password endpoints with the same level of security as login endpoints. Implement strong brute force protection, rate limiting, and account lockout mechanisms to prevent unauthorized access attempts.
5. Require Re-Authentication: For sensitive operations such as changing email addresses or 2FA (Two-Factor Authentication) phone numbers, require users to re-authenticate by providing their current password. This ensures that only authorized individuals can perform critical actions.
6. Follow OWASP Guidelines: Consult the OWASP (Open Web Application Security Project) Authentication Cheatsheet for best practices and guidelines on secure authentication implementation.
7. Implement Multi-Factor Authentication: Where possible, consider implementing multi-factor authentication to add an extra layer of security. This can include methods such as SMS verification, email confirmation, or hardware tokens.
8. Employ Anti-Brute Force Mechanisms: Mitigate credential stuffing, dictionary attacks, and brute force attacks by implementing anti-brute force mechanisms. These mechanisms should be stricter than regular rate limiting and should actively prevent automated attacks.
9. Implement Account Lockout and CAPTCHA: Protect specific user accounts by implementing account lockout mechanisms and CAPTCHA challenges. These measures hinder brute force attacks targeted at individual user accounts.
10. Enforce Strong Passwords: Implement checks to enforce the use of strong passwords, including complexity requirements and checks against commonly used passwords.
11. Distinguish API Keys and User Authentication: Differentiate between API keys and user authentication. API keys should only be used for authenticating API clients, not individual user accounts.

ResilientX Dynamic Application Security Testing and API Security Testing

To address the API2:2023 Broken Authentication vulnerability, ResilientX offers advanced capabilities in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and API Security Testing. These cutting-edge solutions help customers identify and mitigate risks associated with unauthorized access to sensitive data. By utilizing ResilientX’s robust security testing tools, organizations can enhance their API security and fortify their defenses. Here’s how ResilientX’s solutions assist in the detection and prevention of broken object-level authorization:

1. Comprehensive Vulnerability Scanning: ResilientX’s DAST and API Security Testing tools conduct thorough vulnerability scanning across API endpoints. This process involves a meticulous analysis of requests and responses, scrutinizing object identifiers and their usage within API calls. By employing intelligent scanning techniques, ResilientX’s tools provide extensive coverage, effectively detecting security weaknesses that attackers could exploit.
2. Identification of Object-Level Authorization Gaps: ResilientX’s solutions meticulously analyze the authorization mechanisms implemented within API endpoints to identify gaps in object-level authorization. By examining the validation and authorization of object IDs, these tools detect instances where proper checks are missing or inadequate, leading to potential vulnerabilities. Detailed reports are generated, highlighting specific areas where broken object-level authorization exists, enabling organizations to prioritize remediation efforts.
3. Attack Simulation and Impact Assessment: ResilientX’s tools go beyond vulnerability identification by simulating real-world attacks that exploit broken object-level authorization. This simulation feature allows organizations to assess the impact and severity of potential breaches. By understanding the consequences of successful exploitation, organizations can strengthen their defenses and implement appropriate countermeasures.
4. Continuous Monitoring and Compliance: ResilientX’s testing tools offer continuous monitoring and compliance features to ensure ongoing protection against broken object-level authorization vulnerabilities. Organizations can establish automated security scans to detect new instances of broken object-level authorization as APIs evolve. This proactive monitoring enables timely remediation, minimizing the window of opportunity for attackers to exploit vulnerabilities. ResilientX’s solutions also assist organizations in adhering to industry standards and compliance regulations, ensuring that APIs meet the necessary security requirements.

By leveraging ResilientX’s Dynamic Application Security Testing and API Security Testing capabilities, organizations gain powerful tools to detect and prevent broken object-level authorization vulnerabilities. With comprehensive vulnerability scanning, attack simulations, secure code review, continuous monitoring, and collaboration features, organizations can strengthen their API security posture and safeguard against unauthorized access to sensitive data.

API2:2023 broken authentication poses significant risks to the security and integrity of APIs and microservices. By understanding the threat agents, attack vectors, security weaknesses, and impacts associated with broken authentication, organizations can take proactive measures to mitigate these vulnerabilities. Implementing secure authentication mechanisms, following industry standards, and adopting preventive measures can help protect APIs from unauthorized access, account takeovers, and associated risks.

Sign up for ResilientX Security Newsletter